I was once a fast bowler in the country side on my India’s south coastal belt. I was bred of patience, bruised by toil, schooled in the long vigil of the red ball and the silent sermon of line and length. My craft was never born of spectacle, nor did it hunger after applause. It was an art of restraint, of delay, of waiting upon error as a farmer waits upon rain. In those days, the ball spoke softly, and only to those who listened long enough.
Yet even as I set these words upon the page, I confess the treachery of memory. What I offer is no faithful chronicle, but a wavering account shaped by absence and regret. The past now returns to us too little as lived experience, and more as fragments; scorecards without sweat, highlights without hush, and numbers without bodies. Mine is an unreliable narration stitched together from paratexts: faded newspaper clippings, radio commentaries half-remembered, and digital relics that claim to remember for us, and thereby rob us of remembrance itself.
I did not learn my craft in stadiums.
I learned it on uneven village grounds where the pitch was rolled by borrowed labour and patience rather than machinery. Where the boundary was marked by sandals and stones. Where the ball, often scarred, and, sometimes lopsided, was shared like a precious heirloom. I bowled beneath open skies, with no sight-screen but the horizon, and no crowd but a handful of men leaning on bicycles, their applause a nod, their praise a murmured half-lit cigarette uttered as one might bless a good harvest.
In such places, line and length were survival. Miss by a foot and the ball vanished into scrub or cattle dung. Bowl too short and it struck rock. Reverse swing, when it came, arrived as grace earned through long spells, sweat darkening the ball, one side rubbed upon trousers already threadbare from work. There were no cameras to witness it, no graphics to annotate it. The moment lived and died there, known only to bowler, batsman, and wind.
Now the game is loud.
T20 cricket reigneth in India, and with it a clamour that brooks no patience. Bats are swung like scythes in a reckless harvest, and boundaries raining down as if the laws of scarcity had been repealed. In this age of acceleration, defence is derided, attrition despised. Reverse swing, that late, cunning movement born of labour and time hath been buried without marker or mourners. Line and length, once the grammar of fast bowling, lie discarded like obsolete tools in a shed no one visits.
From a material reckoning, this was inevitable. The game hath been folded into the circuits of capital. Overs shortened, pauses erased, and uncertainty streamlined. What could not be measured hath been marginalised; what could not be monetised hath been forgotten. The bowler’s body, once the site of endurance, is, now a consumable unit rotated, rested, and deployed for yield. Figures scroll endlessly across glowing screens as detached from flesh and fatigue.

I retired twice from this world. First, when Javagal Srinath, my hero, my compass laid down his arms. In him dwelt the last dignity of a noble order: a man who ran in with purpose rather than performance, who bowled fast without theatrical fury. When he departed, something vital loosened, though the structure still stood.
My final withdrawal came with the leaving of Rahul Dravid, V V S Laxman, and Sourav Ganguly. Dravid, the Wall, accumulative, obstinate, resistant to haste. Laxman, whose wrists wrote poetry where others merely shouted slogans. Ganguly, defiant, imperfect, yet burning with a leadership born of risk rather than consensus. They batted as if time were an ally, but never an adversary to be outrun. When they were gone, the game lost its spine, and I, my faith.
Yet even here, doubt gnaws at me. For what remains of them now is not presence but simulation: anniversary montages, algorithmic remembrances, bite-sized reverence designed for circulation. Memory hath been commodified. The labour of watching, waiting, enduring hath been replaced by instant recall. Media archaeology teaches us this cruel lesson: when the archive grows too vast, history returns as ghost rather than truth.
In the countryside, memory worked otherwise. Stories were told repeatedly, and imperfectly, altered by voice and mood. A spell bowled in youth was recalled differently each year, its exaggerations honest, its silences meaningful. No one sought accuracy; they sought meaning. Today, the machine remembers everything, and understands nothing.
The modern game, curiously, both submits to and resists this logic. Its endless leagues, formats, seasons, and clips refuse linear closure. There is no finality, no canonical version. From one view, this is pure extraction and content without end. From another, it is refusal. The archive overflows. Meaning collapses. What cannot be neatly mined begins to haunt.
Thus emerges a new mode: digital hauntology. The past neither preserved nor erased, but endlessly replayed, hollowed, spectral. The fast bowler I once was survives only as a ghost that remains unaccounted for by metrics. No statistic captures the long con, the spell built across hours, the batsman softened by doubt, and the wicket taken by inevitability.
I recall my fellow village bowlers who never played beyond district cricket, men who returned after matches to fields and workshops. Our names were never recorded, our figures never archived. Yet, our craft was complete. We bowled for the joy of contest, for pride unadvertised. We are doubly and deathly erased now. First by neglect, then by data.
The white ball offers no such intimacy. It arrives immaculate, departs unchanged, and refuses history. It is a stranger who leaves no trace. The old red ball bore scars like a labourer’s hands. One knew it by touch, by weight, by sound. Its movement was earned, not granted.
And so my narration circles, hesitates, and contradicts itself. It will not resolve, for resolution is the demand of systems that seek optimisation and yield. In refusing clarity, this lament resists extraction. It will not conclude cleanly. That refusal, small though it be, is its politics.
For, the truth, if truth must at last be spoken without ornament, is this: the beauty is long dead. What remains is its circulating and a shimmering hollow afterimage. A ghost that haunts a game which remembers everything except what it once meant.
And so, I lay down my pen as I once laid down the ball with reluctance, with reverence, and with a sorrow that no archive, however vast, may ever quite contain.
Follow Fieldvision on Youtube ,Twitter , Facebook Instagram and Whatsapp Channel for more updates.






Leave a Reply